The Importance of Presupposition
نویسنده
چکیده
The title of this paper may seem presumptuous. But I have chosen it anyway, as a signal of what I see as the central insight that recent studies of presuppo-sition in natural language have given us. Presuppositions are not what early discussions suggested and later ones have, I feel, still done too little to explicitly refute: obstacles to logical transparence, logical simplicity or well-deenedness of meaning, and thus a thing that languages would have been better oo without. On the contrary, presuppositions are valuable tools which language uses to guide the recipient of an utterance, discourse or text towards its intended meaning. In fact, given what we are beginning to understand about the ways in which presuppositions arise and the purposes they serve, it is hard to imagine how a natural language could exist without them. This paper is part of a larger enterprise and the rst of a series. So it would seem to be the right place for a general overview of the theory that has been the target of this enterprise and to say enough about it to give a clear idea of how it works, and how it diiers from other presupposition theories. Unfortunately, this would have required a paper well in excess of what is acceptable in a collection like the present one. So I have had to temper my ambitions and to select some parts of the overall account for special focus, while leaving out a good many others. After some hesitation what to retain of earlier, much bulkier drafts I decided to focus on two aspects of presupposition theory which seem to me to have received comparatively little attention in the literature so far. The rst is one that one might describe as`presuppositional multiplicity': Natural language sentences often give rise not just to one presupposition but to several presuppositions at once. It turns out that combinations of presuppositions triggered within one and the same sentence pose problems that go beyond what we see when focusing on individual presuppositions, as much of the existing
منابع مشابه
A Critical Analysis of Financial Fraud Spam in English in Terms of Persuasive Strategies: Personalization, Presupposition, and Lexical Choices
The term ‘spam’ addresses unsolicited emails sent in bulk; therefore, the term‘financial fraud spam’ refers to unwanted bulk emails in which different tricks and techniques areemployed to swindle money from the recipients. Estimates show that more than 80% of worldwideemail traffic in 2011 was spam. It should be noted that while the number of daily spam emails in2002 was 2.4 billion, this numbe...
متن کاملPresupposition Role in the Compound-Complex Sentence
The article analyzes the role of presupposition in the compound-complex sentence. The authors examine the types of presuppositions and minimal compound-complex sentence as a field of presuppositions action. The analysis of these types of sentences by the material of the English language shows that several kinds of presuppositions are realized in them – contact or distant, - developing in the re...
متن کاملCharacteristics of an Islamic View of Cyber-Ethics
The current Cyber-ethics in Western societies (and its followers in other societies) have been compiled based on secularist presupposition. This presupposition has different principles in comparison with the Islamic attitude which can lead one to take a different approach toward ethical problems. This paper is an attempt to propose principles of Islamic cyber-ethics upon which we can prepare an...
متن کاملDeaccenting, MAXIMIZE PRESUPPOSITION and Evidential Scale
Some studies have assumed that prosodic patterns of sentences are exclusively determined by the rules of accented expressions, with deaccenting of non-focused elements playing little or no role [1, 2]. However, many researchers have also recognized the importance of deaccenting rules [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. This paper documents two intonational patterns of Japanese biased questions, ”Rise with Accents...
متن کاملSemantic and Pragmatic Presupposition in Discourse Representation Theory
This paper investigates semantic and pragmatic presupposition in Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) and enhances the pragmatic perspective of presupposition in DRT. In doing so, it draws attention to the need to account for agent presupposition (i.e. both speaker and hearer presupposition) when dealing with pragmatic presupposition. Furthermore, this paper links this pragmatic conception of ...
متن کاملQuestions, Answers and Presuppositions
The paper deals with empirical questions that come attached with a presupposition. In case that the presupposition is not true, there is no unambiguous direct answer. In such a case an adequate complete answer is a negated presupposition. Yet these simple ideas are connected with a bunch of problems. First, we must distinguish between a pragmatic and semantic presupposition, and thus also betwe...
متن کامل